Published On: Sun, Oct 27th, 2013

A frozen society: the long term implications of NSA’s secrets

HFN has been thinking about the historical and future implications of Edward Snowden’s NSA files that have been leaked bit by bit over the past few months.   HFN is very worried.

Edward Snowden’s act of handing over classified NSA files to The Guardian and The New York Times has polarised many people into two opposing groups.

The Pro-Snowden group argues that Snowden is a selfless hero, should be nominated for a Nobel Peace Prize, and has revealed illegal acts by our security services that our elected officials, who were supposed to control them, were not even aware of.

The Anti-Snowden group argues that Snowden is a naive idealist whose actions are now making society more dangerous by teaching would be terrorists what British and American security services are capable of doing, and by implication, how they can avoid detection to hatch their heinous plots.  If you have nothing to hide, they add, you have nothing to worry about.

Had the US government had the tools of the NSA today the Civil Rights movement may never have happened.

Had the US government had the tools of the NSA today the Civil Rights movement may never have happened.

There are two fundamental flaws with the Anti-Snowden group argument.

First, there are so many laws out there, many archaic and forgotten, that every single citizen is likely to break a law at some point.  In addition,  in most people’s personal lives they will have some transgression that they want to keep private.

The first flaw allows those in control of the data to use it actively or passively against its citizens.  If you are an elected politician the chances are that you have done something wrong at some point in your life or have something private that you want to hide.

Security services could use this information to “screen” politicians and their supporters.  This has happened before.  J. Edgar Hoover, as the founding Director of the FBI, until his death in 1972, had detailed files on many US politicians, including President Kennedy and President Harry Truman.  Both considered firing him.  Neither was brave enough.  In the early 1950s Joseph McCarthy led a witch hunt of US civil servants, politicians, actors and the like, looking for alleged Communists.  Their access to information was amateurish compared to what is possible by the NSA and GCHQ today.

They can also use this information passively.  They can simply let politicians know what the security services know about them.  The threat of exposure can be a subtle one, making politicians more likely to vote for policies that the security services are in favour of.

The second flaw is that it is frequently necessary to break the law in order to further an important social cause. Slavery was legal in the US south until 1865. Women did not get the vote in the UK until 1928.  African – Americans faced huge legalised forms of discrimination until the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  Interracial marriage only became legal in most US states in 1967.  Homosexuality only became legal in all of the US in 2003.

All of these legal changes were preceded by difficulties and civil strife.   The activists who were fighting to change society were frequently breaking the law.

Imagine how hard it would be now to lead one of these movements today.  All of your communications with other supporters could be monitored.  They would know who is connected to who.  They would know your private secrets.  You could be either rounded up, or co-opted through blackmail.

Occasionally the security services announce that a major terrorist plot has been discovered and stopped.  We collectively breathe a sigh of relief at a near disaster avoided.

But the same tools that were used to stop those terrorists could have stopped women from getting the right to vote and black children from going to school with white children.

Sometimes change is needed.  By allowing a few unelected people to have control over our secrets we may end up with a frozen, unchanging, society.

This is not a good thing.

—-
Enjoyed the article? Share it with your friends!

About the Author

- Tristan Fischer is the author of all the articles on History Future Now. He is the Chairman of Lumicity Ltd, a company developing renewable energy infrastructure projects, Chairman of Fischer Farms Ltd, a vertical farming company using hydroponics, and a board Director of Fish From Ltd, an onshore salmon company. He previously worked for Camco International, Shell Renewables and Citigroup. He was educated at Cambridge University. To find out more click here: https://uk.linkedin.com/in/tristanfischer

  • Jihane Elias

    may be there s no real link between the NSA scandals lately and the ability for a society to make collective dreams and ambitions come true..and if there is,it must be mainly a good lesson to learn and more determination in realising the possible..the right thing to do.

  • clifton6982@mail.ru

    Although the vast majorities close to home lives they will have some transgression that they need to keep private. They can basically tell lawmakers what the security administrations think about them. The second imperfection is that it is every now and again important to infringe upon the law keeping in mind the end goal to facilitate a vital social cause. These legitimate changes were gone before by challenges and common strife. The activists who were battling to change society where every now and again infringing upon the law.

HFN on Twitter